Pricing

My rates for this service. Fixed scope, no time-limited discounts, no claim of an industry standard. Larger sites are quoted individually.

Strategy Audit

From \u00a3500

Best for: Established sites whose content underperforms.

Included: Content audit \u00b7 cannibalisation analysis \u00b7 intent review \u00b7 linking review \u00b7 priority fix list \u00b7 findings call

Timeframe: 2 to 3 weeks

Not included: Keyword research, calendar, clusters, briefs, writing

\u2605 RECOMMENDED

Strategy & Roadmap

From \u00a31,000

Best for: Businesses committed to organic growth this year.

Included: Everything in the Audit, plus audience research \u00b7 keyword and intent research \u00b7 gap analysis \u00b7 topic clusters \u00b7 priority matrix \u00b7 linking architecture \u00b7 6 month calendar \u00b7 commercial mapping \u00b7 two review calls

Timeframe: 4 to 5 weeks

Not included: Writing, technical SEO, link building, implementation

Complete System

From \u00a32,000

Best for: Multi-service businesses producing content at pace.

Included: Everything in the Roadmap, plus 12 month calendar \u00b7 topical authority plan \u00b7 10 content briefs \u00b7 refresh schedule \u00b7 entity mapping \u00b7 three months of support

Timeframe: 6 to 8 weeks, plus support

Not included: Writing, technical SEO, link building, design, paid media

Why the middle package suits most businesses. The audit tells you what is wrong but stops before what to build. The complete system is more valuable, though paying for twelve months of briefs you cannot execute is poor value.

Who It\u2019s For, and Who It Isn\u2019t

A good fit

  • UK small businesses where twelve wrong pages is a costly mistake
  • London businesses in dense markets where specificity wins
  • Service businesses needing distinct content routes per offering
  • Professional services whose expertise is not in their content
  • SaaS mapping content across a long consideration cycle
  • Ecommerce where categories, guides and product pages must work as one
  • B2B with long sales cycles and several decision influencers
  • Local businesses balancing location pages against useful content
  • Growing websites that outgrew what worked at thirty pages
  • Consultants and startups fixing architecture before it gets expensive

Probably not a fit

  • You need results this quarter. Refreshes move within weeks, new content takes months. If you need enquiries inside thirty days, paid search serves you better.
  • You want guaranteed rankings. Nobody can guarantee positions, and anyone offering to is misrepresenting search.
  • There is no budget for the content itself. A strategy that is never executed helps nobody.
  • Existing content cannot be changed. The best actions involve updating, merging or removing pages.
  • You want a keyword list without prioritisation. Tools produce that cheaply. It is not this service.
  • You expect SEO to behave like paid ads. You cannot raise spend and see traffic rise that afternoon.

SEO Content Strategy and AI Search

People now ask questions in Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, and some of those conversations replace visits that would once have reached your site. The foundations overlap with conventional SEO: these systems draw on content that is indexed, structured and clearly attributed.

Traditional SEO

Gets content discovered, crawled and indexed.

Topical authority

Raises the chance yours is the most complete answer.

Entity clarity

Ambiguity is hard for a machine to resolve.

Structured content

Clear headings, direct answers, appropriate schema.

AI search visibility

The outcome that may follow, which nobody can promise.

I do not promise AI citations. No one controls which sources these systems reference. If AI visibility is a primary objective, AI Marketing & GEO goes deeper.

Why Work With Me

Learn more about how I work.

You speak to the person doing the work

Nothing is handed to a junior after the sales call.

Strategy before execution

Three weeks deciding what to build beats three months building the wrong thing.

No agency layers

No account manager relaying messages between you and the work.

Business-focused

Sometimes that means declining opportunities that flatter a traffic chart.

Practical and specific

Named pages, changes, links and order, not principles to translate.

UK market focus

Built for UK search behaviour and buying language.

Certifications

Master ChatGPT Certification

AI-Powered Shopping Ads Certification

Google Analytics Certification

Google Digital Garage Certificate

PgDip Digital Marketing (Distinction)

Verified Reviews

Verified by Clutch \u2605\u2605\u2605\u2605\u2605 5.0

\u201cNaeem successfully rolled out a modern, SEO-friendly website that accurately depicted the client\u2019s business structure and services. The team established a smooth workflow through timely outputs, clear communication, and prompt support. Their broad expertise impressed the client.\u201d

Md Kamrul HasanBizz Group \u2014 Bizz Solution BD

Verified by Clutch \u2605\u2605\u2605\u2605\u2605 5.0

\u201cMd Naeem Hossan improved organic website traffic by 25%. Increased qualified leads by 20%. Achieved first-page rankings for 15+ keywords. Increased social media engagement by 30%. Completed 100% of assigned project objectives within deadlines.\u201d

COOUK Apprenticeship Provider

Verified by Fiverr \u2605\u2605\u2605\u2605\u2605 5.0

\u201cIt was a great experience. He understood exactly what I needed to get done and it was a seamless process. He was assertive and very professional, the communication was perfect. I have a lot of work to get done and will definitely use him.\u201d

kobe2024Founder & Director

5.0 \u2605\u2605\u2605\u2605\u2605 average on Clutch, verified reviews.

See published case studies for detailed results.

Realistic Expectations

Cannot be guaranteed

  • Rankings \u2014 dependent on competitors and algorithm changes
  • Traffic \u2014 demand shifts, and AI Overviews are changing click behaviour
  • Leads \u2014 enquiries depend on your offer and sales process too
  • Revenue \u2014 too many factors sit outside content
  • AI citations \u2014 nobody controls what these systems reference

What you can reasonably expect

  • Better prioritisation \u2014 a defensible answer to what comes next
  • Clearer direction \u2014 everyone working from the same plan
  • Stronger architecture \u2014 easier to crawl and extend
  • Better intent alignment \u2014 the commonest cause of underperformance
  • Efficient production \u2014 fewer duplicated pages and rewrites
  • A structured roadmap \u2014 with reasoning attached, so it survives staff changes

On timing: refreshes and cannibalisation fixes sometimes move within four to eight weeks, because those pages already have history. New content in a competitive market usually needs three to six months. Firmer timelines are guesswork.

Frequently Asked Questions

The layer that decides what you create, in what order, for which intent, and how each piece connects to your revenue pages. Keyword research tells you what people search; strategy tells you why those decisions were made.

From \u00a3950 for an audit, \u00a32,450 for a full strategy and six month roadmap, \u00a34,750 for the complete system. Larger sites are quoted individually. Content production is separate.

Two to three weeks for an audit, four to five for a full strategy, six to eight for the complete system, depending on how quickly I get Search Console access.

Usually yes, and yours is useful input. What it lacks is prioritisation: which queries matter commercially, which should merge into one page, and what order to tackle them in. I validate it against Search Console, because keyword data ages quickly.

Strategy decides what should be written and why; writing produces the words. Confusing the two is how businesses end up with well-written articles that were never going to work. The briefs let your own writer execute without me. See content and email marketing for the writing service.

Fewer than most people expect. Two thorough pieces outperform eight thin ones. Without a dedicated content resource, one to two a month is realistic; with a writer in-house, four to eight.

Yes, and that is where it delivers most. Sites with two or three years of content usually have cannibalisation, pages ranking just outside visibility and half-covered topics. Faster wins than anything new.

A comparison of your content against the sites competing with you in the results. The value is the filtering: a raw report lists hundreds of items, most unrealistic for your authority. The output is what is relevant and winnable.

In Search Console, check which pages appear for a query you care about. If the URL changes between periods, or several pages surface without any ranking well, that is the pattern.

It improves the conditions, and nobody can promise more. These systems draw on content that is indexed, structured and comprehensive, which good strategy produces anyway. Whether one cites you is outside anyone\u2019s control. If AI visibility is a primary objective, AI Marketing & GEO goes deeper.

Free Strategy Consultation

Let\u2019s find out whether a content strategy is the right next step

The first conversation costs nothing and needs no preparation. It is a working call rather than a pitch, and you should finish it with a clearer view of your own site whether or not we go further.

We cover how your content is performing, the opportunities in your market, where effort is wasted, and a sensible order of priorities for the next six to twelve months. If it is not the right time, I will tell you.

London-based SEO content strategist. Working across the UK.